A punked cocktail
Cool cover English edition. |
La mucama de Omicunlé (Tentacle) by Rita Indiana.
I had a recent
streak of books that leave me wondering on how to consider them. This was one
of them. Did I enjoy reading it? No, it was nasty. Do I think it is a good
book? Yes. I have been there before, but the other detail that defined the
latest experiences was that as I thought it was brilliant, some of its flaws and
aspects that I disliked (subjective, of course) were big too.
First off, I
think the whole plot was very smart, some turns were very neat and I didn’t see
them coming at all. The whole setting was different and interesting. It has a
gritty and harsh quality that feels a lot more apocalyptic than a lot of books.
Themes like race, class, religion, the absence of morality in survivor mode come
strong in the narrative and can give you a headache or two.
The main
characters are very well defined and feel very real, you really want them to
pull through or to fail (eh, depending which one), getting invested with them
very quickly.
Random mumbling.
It made me
consider about what it is usually expected from heroes, more an antihero in
this case, but still. Mild Spoilers. How can we ask everything from a hero,
including sacrifice, when the hero has never had something? We assume people
will sacrifice everything because it is needed, morally right or correct, when
they may don’t have the tools to do it, the mental and affective frame to make
that choice. Who is at fault, the hero or the blank expectation? End of Spoilers.
Now, the parts
that were not so good for me. The setting, as much as it was interesting, it
didn’t mesh through the story. You have a natural disaster that infects people
and along the way you forget about it, because it seems it has no major
consequence, the infected are dropped rather quickly and appear to be not more
than an element of shock. No other direct ramifications from the natural
disaster are shown in the life of people. Some cool futuristic details don’t
make a complete picture of a timing either, the different time frames have
little distinction on their core.
Finally, an
even more subjective consideration related to my displeasure when reading the
book: the female figures felt empty and a complete vehicle to the male
machinations and plot. As for being violent and harsh, it is part of a
narrative and setting the author wanted to portray, but it became too much. The
crass sexual and violent thoughts in Argenis mind came through more
exploitative or with the intention to shock or disgust more than a needed part
of the narrative, I think you could transmit the message without getting
overboard with it and I felt it made a disservice to the poignant experiences the
characters suffer.
And then...
It is a very
good book, clever, rough and original, but I can’t say it is an experience I
want to keep present.
Comments
Post a Comment